After being in and out of classrooms for a
week, I am surprised at my own ease with the way teachers here interact with
their students. My first impression was that these fifth graders were being
controlled a bit too much by the teachers. They seemed to be what for me has so
far been a complete no-no in terms of teacher qualities. They appeared strict.
And I was taken aback.
Having spent a considerable amount of time
within these classrooms, I have come to understand and even appreciate the
teachers’ way of dealing with their students.
Fifth graders, at ten years of age, are by
no means model representatives of the human civilisation. They behave more like
monkeys when left to themselves. And the ten year olds at Heritage are no
different. As soon as the teacher leaves the classroom, they start making noise
and prance about the classroom. If the teacher is paying individual attention
to one child, restlessness pours out of all the others.
So controlling the class seems essential on
the part of the teacher. And sometimes it is so essential that it even feels
like it is pointed out a bit too frequently. As if the entire purpose of coming
to school is for children to learn how to be managed effectively.
But that is not the only characteristic
that defines the quality of a teacher here. Every teacher whose class I’ve
visited has a distinct quality, and her class resonates with these qualities,
giving every classroom a unique culture. There is so much to say about the
classroom culture in each section I will probably dedicate another post to it.
I may not have liked that the teachers
appeared ‘strict’, but I was greatly comforted by how they appeared to own this
strictness. It wasn’t something that seemed to be handed down to them by
someone else or by authorities. The teachers seem to have figured out through
their own experiences the necessity of being strict in order to maintain a
learning-favourable environment in the classroom. Of course, if the class size
was smaller, I am sure the teachers would have had an entirely different
approach. But the large size of the class seems something both teachers and
students are aware of. And the comprises that have to be made along with them
are something that students also seem to understand and respect. In fact, in my
observations, I got a sense that the students are self-aware--to the extent
that they realise that in being their natural ten year old self, they become
restless and fidgety and can cause disturbances to the rest of the class. And
they even seem to implicitly understand that what the teacher is doing is not
to force them into undesired circumstances but as a means to help them learn
better. And the children at this school love what they learn. And it seems the
discipline they ought to adhere to has obvious rewards--that come to them in
the learning activities they get to participate in. So that, somewhere in all
this, the students have respect for the teachers’ strictness.
In my own schooling, and then later on in
my time as a teacher, I have fought with the idea of a strict teacher. It was
something that did not appeal to me at all. But then I also realise that what
students need unconsciously, and look for, is a teacher who is also an adult
figure they can look up to. They don’t have to serve the function of a friend
alone. If it is an established understanding that the teacher is wiser and more
mature and capable of helping you, that serves as a solid foundation on which
to build classroom dynamics.
I like that I entered the classroom with my
own set of assumptions and that during the process of observation, I saw some
of my most solid assumptions be put to the test. It helps to have your
assumptions challenged because that always offers opportunities for learning
and for self improvement. I may not be as strict a teacher--for every teacher
comes with their own personal qualities. But this certainly helps me view
teachers who are strict in a different and appreciative light.
No comments:
Post a Comment